You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The North Atlantic Aerosol and Marine Ecosystem Study (NAAMES): Science Motive and Mission Overview
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2019.00122 |
| Authors |
Michael J. Behrenfeld, Richard H. Moore, Chris A. Hostetler, Jason Graff, Peter Gaube, Lynn M. Russell, Gao Chen, Scott C. Doney, Stephen Giovannoni, Hongyu Liu, Christopher Proctor, Luis M. Bolaños, Nicholas Baetge, Cleo Davie-Martin, Toby K. Westberry, Timothy S. Bates, Thomas G. Bell, Kay D. Bidle, Emmanuel S. Boss, Sarah D. Brooks, Brian Cairns, Craig Carlson, Kimberly Halsey, Elizabeth L. Harvey, Chuanmin Hu, Lee Karp-Boss, Mary Kleb, Susanne Menden-Deuer, Françoise Morison, Patricia K. Quinn, Amy Jo Scarino, Bruce Anderson, Jacek Chowdhary, Ewan Crosbie, Richard Ferrare, Johnathan W. Hair, Yongxiang Hu, Scott Janz, Jens Redemann, Eric Saltzman, Michael Shook, David A. Siegel, Armin Wisthaler, Melissa Yang Martin, Luke Ziemba |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 30% |
| Ireland | 2 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 70% |
| Scientists | 6 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 23% |
| Researcher | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 34 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 32 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,038,199
of 24,163,421 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#1,414
of 9,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,489
of 355,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#58
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,163,421 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.