You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global Observational Needs and Resources for Marine Biodiversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2019.00367 |
| Authors |
Gabrielle Canonico, Pier Luigi Buttigieg, Enrique Montes, Frank E. Muller-Karger, Carol Stepien, Dawn Wright, Abigail Benson, Brian Helmuth, Mark Costello, Isabel Sousa-Pinto, Hanieh Saeedi, Jan Newton, Ward Appeltans, Nina Bednaršek, Levente Bodrossy, Benjamin D. Best, Angelika Brandt, Kelly D. Goodwin, Katrin Iken, Antonio C. Marques, Patricia Miloslavich, Martin Ostrowski, Woody Turner, Eric P. Achterberg, Tom Barry, Omar Defeo, Gregorio Bigatti, Lea-Anne Henry, Berta Ramiro-Sánchez, Pablo Durán, Telmo Morato, J. Murray Roberts, Ana García-Alegre, Mar Sacau Cuadrado, Bramley Murton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Ireland | 2 | 5% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Seychelles | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 76% |
| Scientists | 7 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 239 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 62 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 48 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 74 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,383,202
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#941
of 9,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,951
of 349,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#42
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.