You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Polar Ocean Observations: A Critical Gap in the Observing System and Its Effect on Environmental Predictions From Hours to a Season
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2019.00429 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gregory C. Smith, Richard Allard, Marcel Babin, Laurent Bertino, Matthieu Chevallier, Gary Corlett, Julia Crout, Fraser Davidson, Bruno Delille, Sarah T. Gille, David Hebert, Patrick Hyder, Janet Intrieri, José Lagunas, Gilles Larnicol, Thomas Kaminski, Belinda Kater, Frank Kauker, Claudie Marec, Matthew Mazloff, E. Joseph Metzger, Calvin Mordy, Anne O’Carroll, Steffen M. Olsen, Michael Phelps, Pamela Posey, Pierre Prandi, Eric Rehm, Phillip Reid, Ignatius Rigor, Stein Sandven, Matthew Shupe, Sebastiaan Swart, Ole Martin Smedstad, Amy Solomon, Andrea Storto, Pierre Thibaut, John Toole, Kevin Wood, Jiping Xie, Qinghua Yang, the WWRP PPP Steering Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 2 | 20% |
Germany | 2 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 10% |
Spain | 1 | 10% |
Canada | 1 | 10% |
Italy | 1 | 10% |
France | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
Scientists | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 27 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Student > Master | 7 | 5% |
Other | 20 | 15% |
Unknown | 44 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 40 | 30% |
Environmental Science | 17 | 13% |
Engineering | 9 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 8% |
Unknown | 46 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,942,035
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#2,963
of 9,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,698
of 346,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#135
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.