↓ Skip to main content

Constraining the Oceanic Uptake and Fluxes of Greenhouse Gases by Building an Ocean Network of Certified Stations: The Ocean Component of the Integrated Carbon Observation System, ICOS-Oceans

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Constraining the Oceanic Uptake and Fluxes of Greenhouse Gases by Building an Ocean Network of Certified Stations: The Ocean Component of the Integrated Carbon Observation System, ICOS-Oceans
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, September 2019
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2019.00544
Authors

Tobias Steinhoff, Thanos Gkritzalis, Siv K. Lauvset, Steve Jones, Ute Schuster, Are Olsen, Meike Becker, Roberto Bozzano, Fabio Brunetti, Carolina Cantoni, Vanessa Cardin, Denis Diverrès, Björn Fiedler, Agneta Fransson, Michele Giani, Sue Hartman, Mario Hoppema, Emil Jeansson, Truls Johannessen, Vassilis Kitidis, Arne Körtzinger, Camilla Landa, Nathalie Lefèvre, Anna Luchetta, Lieven Naudts, Philip D. Nightingale, Abdirahman M. Omar, Sara Pensieri, Benjamin Pfeil, Rocío Castaño-Primo, Gregor Rehder, Anna Rutgersson, Richard Sanders, Ingo Schewe, Giuseppe Siena, Ingunn Skjelvan, Thomas Soltwedel, Steven van Heuven, Andrew Watson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Other 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 13 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 15 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,412,678
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#2,259
of 10,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,400
of 353,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#102
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.