You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Collaborative Database to Track Mass Mortality Events in the Mediterranean Sea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2019.00707 |
| Authors |
Joaquim Garrabou, Daniel Gómez-Gras, Jean-Baptiste Ledoux, Cristina Linares, Nathaniel Bensoussan, Paula López-Sendino, Hocein Bazairi, Free Espinosa, Mohamed Ramdani, Samir Grimes, Mouloud Benabdi, Jamila Ben Souissi, Emna Soufi, Faten Khamassi, Raouia Ghanem, Oscar Ocaña, Alfonso Ramos-Esplà, Andres Izquierdo, Irene Anton, Esther Rubio-Portillo, Carmen Barbera, Emma Cebrian, Nuria Marbà, Iris E. Hendriks, Carlos M. Duarte, Salud Deudero, David Díaz, Maite Vázquez-Luis, Elvira Alvarez, Bernat Hereu, Diego K. Kersting, Andrea Gori, Núria Viladrich, Stephane Sartoretto, Ivane Pairaud, Sandrine Ruitton, Gérard Pergent, Christine Pergent-Martini, Elodie Rouanet, Nuria Teixidó, Jean-Pierre Gattuso, Simonetta Fraschetti, Irene Rivetti, Ernesto Azzurro, Carlo Cerrano, Massimo Ponti, Eva Turicchia, Giorgio Bavestrello, Riccardo Cattaneo-Vietti, Marzia Bo, Marco Bertolino, Monica Montefalcone, Giovanni Chimienti, Daniele Grech, Gil Rilov, Inci Tuney Kizilkaya, Zafer Kizilkaya, Nur Eda Topçu, Vasilis Gerovasileiou, Maria Sini, Tatjana Bakran-Petricioli, Silvija Kipson, Jean G. Harmelin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 122 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 20 | 16% |
| France | 8 | 7% |
| United States | 6 | 5% |
| Australia | 5 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 4% |
| Germany | 4 | 3% |
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| Greece | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 60 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 88 | 72% |
| Scientists | 32 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 146 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 53 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 32 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 57 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 140. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#301,592
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#176
of 10,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,064
of 478,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#7
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.