You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
GliderTools: A Python Toolbox for Processing Underwater Glider Data
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2019.00738 |
Authors |
Luke Gregor, Thomas J. Ryan-Keogh, Sarah-Anne Nicholson, Marcel du Plessis, Isabelle Giddy, Sebastiaan Swart |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 14% |
France | 3 | 9% |
Australia | 3 | 9% |
South Africa | 2 | 6% |
Switzerland | 2 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
Canada | 2 | 6% |
Germany | 2 | 6% |
Sweden | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 18 | 51% |
Members of the public | 15 | 43% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 41% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,485,318
of 24,084,574 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#1,024
of 9,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,481
of 465,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#29
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,084,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 465,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.