You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Expanding Tara Oceans Protocols for Underway, Ecosystemic Sampling of the Ocean-Atmosphere Interface During Tara Pacific Expedition (2016–2018)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2019.00750 |
| Authors |
Gabriel Gorsky, Guillaume Bourdin, Fabien Lombard, Maria Luiza Pedrotti, Samuel Audrain, Nicolas Bin, Emmanuel Boss, Chris Bowler, Nicolas Cassar, Loic Caudan, Genevieve Chabot, Natalie R. Cohen, Daniel Cron, Colomban De Vargas, John R. Dolan, Eric Douville, Amanda Elineau, J. Michel Flores, Jean Francois Ghiglione, Nils Haëntjens, Martin Hertau, Seth G. John, Rachel L. Kelly, Ilan Koren, Yajuan Lin, Dominique Marie, Clémentine Moulin, Yohann Moucherie, Stéphane Pesant, Marc Picheral, Julie Poulain, Mireille Pujo-Pay, Gilles Reverdin, Sarah Romac, Mathew B. Sullivan, Miri Trainic, Marc Tressol, Romain Troublé, Assaf Vardi, Christian R. Voolstra, Patrick Wincker, Sylvain Agostini, Bernard Banaigs, Emilie Boissin, Didier Forcioli, Paola Furla, Pierre E. Galand, Eric Gilson, Stéphanie Reynaud, Shinichi Sunagawa, Olivier P. Thomas, Rebecca Lisette Vega Thurber, Didier Zoccola, Serge Planes, Denis Allemand, Eric Karsenti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 9% |
| Germany | 2 | 9% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Bahamas | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 70% |
| Scientists | 7 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 35 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 41 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,718,582
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#1,834
of 10,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,214
of 474,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#53
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.