You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Systematic Review Shows That Work Done by Storm Waves Can Be Misinterpreted as Tsunami-Related Because Commonly Used Hydrodynamic Equations Are Flawed
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2020.00004 |
Authors |
Rónadh Cox, Fabrice Ardhuin, Frédéric Dias, Ronan Autret, Nicole Beisiegel, Claire S. Earlie, James G. Herterich, Andrew Kennedy, Raphaël Paris, Alison Raby, Pál Schmitt, Robert Weiss |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
France | 3 | 14% |
Switzerland | 2 | 9% |
United States | 2 | 9% |
Ireland | 1 | 5% |
Italy | 1 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 11 | 50% |
Members of the public | 10 | 45% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
Researcher | 6 | 17% |
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Professor | 2 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 13 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 33% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,720,228
of 25,070,356 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#1,172
of 10,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,874
of 462,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#31
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,070,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.