You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A New Network for the Advancement of Marine Biotechnology in Europe and Beyond
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2020.00278 |
| Authors |
Ana Rotter, Ariola Bacu, Michèle Barbier, Francesco Bertoni, Atle M. Bones, M. Leonor Cancela, Jens Carlsson, Maria F. Carvalho, Marta Cegłowska, Meltem Conk Dalay, Thanos Dailianis, Irem Deniz, Dragana Drakulovic, Arita Dubnika, Hjörleifur Einarsson, Ayşegül Erdoğan, Orhan Tufan Eroldoğan, David Ezra, Stefano Fazi, Richard J. FitzGerald, Laura M. Gargan, Susana P. Gaudêncio, Nadica Ivošević DeNardis, Danijela Joksimovic, Marija Kataržytė, Jonne Kotta, Manolis Mandalakis, Inga Matijošytė, Hanna Mazur-Marzec, Alexia Massa-Gallucci, Mohamed Mehiri, Søren Laurentius Nielsen, Lucie Novoveská, Donata Overlingė, Michelle E. Portman, Krzysztof Pyrc, Céline Rebours, Thorsten Reinsch, Fernando Reyes, Baruch Rinkevich, Johan Robbens, Vita Rudovica, Jerica Sabotič, Ivo Safarik, Siret Talve, Deniz Tasdemir, Xenia Theodotou Schneider, Olivier P. Thomas, Anna Toruńska-Sitarz, Giovanna Cristina Varese, Marlen I. Vasquez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 3 | 12% |
| Slovenia | 2 | 8% |
| Italy | 2 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 72% |
| Scientists | 6 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 23% |
| Unknown | 45 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,813,112
of 25,235,400 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#1,227
of 10,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,298
of 391,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#54
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,235,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.