You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of in-situ and Digital Image-Based Assessments of Coral Health and Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2020.00304 |
| Authors |
John H. R. Burns, Grady Weyenberg, Travis Mandel, Sofia B. Ferreira, Drew Gotshalk, Chad K. Kinoshita, Micah J. Marshall, Nicholas A. V. Del Moral, Shane J. Murphy, Kailey H. Pascoe, Alexandra Runyan, Alexander J. Spengler, Brittany D. Wells, Danielle K. Wilde, Roberto Pelayo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 8 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 10% |
| Engineering | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,551,612
of 23,199,478 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#3,931
of 8,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,123
of 382,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#170
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,199,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.