You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Good News — Bad News: Combined Ocean Change Drivers Decrease Survival but Have No Negative Impact on Nutritional Value and Organoleptic Quality of the Northern Shrimp
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2020.00611 |
| Authors |
Mathilde Chemel, Fanny Noisette, Denis Chabot, Ella Guscelli, Luc Leclerc, Piero Calosi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2020.
All research outputs
#15,620,220
of 23,225,652 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#5,854
of 8,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,612
of 398,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#262
of 325 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,225,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 325 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.