You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Public Perceptions of Mangrove Forests Matter for Their Conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2020.603651 |
| Authors |
Farid Dahdouh-Guebas, Gordon N. Ajonina, A. Aldrie Amir, Dominic A. Andradi-Brown, Irfan Aziz, Thorsten Balke, Edward B. Barbier, Stefano Cannicci, Simon M. Cragg, Marília Cunha-Lignon, David J. Curnick, Carlos M. Duarte, Norman C. Duke, Charlie Endsor, Sara Fratini, Ilka C. Feller, François Fromard, Jean Hugé, Mark Huxham, James G. Kairo, Tadashi Kajita, Kandasamy Kathiresan, Nico Koedam, Shing Yip Lee, Hsing-Juh Lin, Jock R. Mackenzie, Mwita M. Mangora, Cyril Marchand, Tarik Meziane, Todd E. Minchinton, Nathalie Pettorelli, Jaime Polanía, Gianluca Polgar, Meenakshi Poti, Jurgenne Primavera, Alfredo Quarto, Stefanie M. Rog, Behara Satyanarayana, Yara Schaeffer-Novelli, Mark Spalding, Tom Van der Stocken, Dominic Wodehouse, Jean W. H. Yong, Martin Zimmer, Daniel A. Friess |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 105 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 10% |
| Australia | 7 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 6% |
| Belgium | 5 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 3% |
| Singapore | 2 | 2% |
| Philippines | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 46 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 73 | 70% |
| Scientists | 29 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 46 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 40 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 50 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#498,601
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#314
of 10,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,873
of 521,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#13
of 326 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 326 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.