↓ Skip to main content

Assessing Habitat Suitability Models for the Deep Sea: Is Our Ability to Predict the Distributions of Seafloor Fauna Improving?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing Habitat Suitability Models for the Deep Sea: Is Our Ability to Predict the Distributions of Seafloor Fauna Improving?
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, April 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2021.632389
Authors

David A. Bowden, Owen F. Anderson, Ashley A. Rowden, Fabrice Stephenson, Malcolm R. Clark

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 21 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Computer Science 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 19 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2021.
All research outputs
#15,147,751
of 24,492,652 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#5,385
of 9,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,692
of 430,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#281
of 419 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,492,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 419 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.