You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
First Assessment of the Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Global Marine Recreational Fisheries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2021.735741 |
| Authors |
Pablo Pita, Gillian B. Ainsworth, Bernardino Alba, Antônio B. Anderson, Manel Antelo, Josep Alós, Iñaki Artetxe, Jérôme Baudrier, José J. Castro, Belén Chicharro, Karim Erzini, Keno Ferter, Mafalda Freitas, Laura García-de-la-Fuente, José A. García-Charton, María Giménez-Casalduero, Antoni M. Grau, Hugo Diogo, Ana Gordoa, Filipe Henriques, Kieran Hyder, David Jiménez-Alvarado, Paraskevi K. Karachle, Josep Lloret, Martin Laporta, Adam M. Lejk, Arnau L. Dedeu, Pablo Martín-Sosa, Lllibori Martínez, Antoni M. Mira, Beatriz Morales-Nin, Estanis Mugerza, Hans J. Olesen, Anastasios Papadopoulos, João Pontes, José J. Pascual-Fernández, Ariadna Purroy, Milena Ramires, Mafalda Rangel, José Amorim Reis-Filho, Jose L. Sánchez-Lizaso, Virginia Sandoval, Valerio Sbragaglia, Luis Silva, Christian Skov, Iván Sola, Harry V. Strehlow, María A. Torres, Didzis Ustups, Tessa van der Hammen, Pedro Veiga, Leonardo A. Venerus, Thomas Verleye, Sebastián Villasante, Marc Simon Weltersbach, Lucía Zarauz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 15 | 47% |
| Belgium | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 66% |
| Scientists | 11 | 34% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 18% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 14% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 40 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,428,328
of 24,162,843 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#979
of 9,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,486
of 429,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#36
of 560 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,162,843 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 560 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.