You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
When Imagery and Physical Sampling Work Together: Toward an Integrative Methodology of Deep-Sea Image-Based Megafauna Identification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2021.749078 |
| Authors |
Mélissa Hanafi-Portier, Sarah Samadi, Laure Corbari, Tin-Yam Chan, Wei-Jen Chen, Jhen-Nien Chen, Mao-Ying Lee, Christopher Mah, Thomas Saucède, Catherine Borremans, Karine Olu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 29% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 6 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,050,912
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#4,258
of 10,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,405
of 515,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#187
of 526 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 526 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.