↓ Skip to main content

Overlapping-calibration of wide-swath altimeter baseline errors using two satellites formation flying design

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Overlapping-calibration of wide-swath altimeter baseline errors using two satellites formation flying design
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, November 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2022.1027654
Authors

Chunyong Ma, Xuan Wang, Zhanwen Gao, Zheng Li, Chaofang Zhao, Ge Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#15,651,993
of 24,792,414 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#5,828
of 10,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,666
of 434,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#295
of 786 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,792,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 786 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.