You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Limited conservation efficacy of large-scale marine protected areas for Pacific skipjack and bigeye tunas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2022.1060943 |
| Authors |
John Hampton, Patrick Lehodey, Inna Senina, Simon Nicol, Joe Scutt Phillips, Kaon Tiamere |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 19% |
| France | 2 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 67% |
| Scientists | 6 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 45% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 4 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#905,651
of 25,603,577 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#596
of 10,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,099
of 477,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#16
of 757 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,603,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 757 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.