↓ Skip to main content

XBT operational best practices for quality assurance

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
XBT operational best practices for quality assurance
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, September 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2022.991760
Authors

Justine Parks, Francis Bringas, Rebecca Cowley, Craig Hanstein, Lisa Krummel, Janet Sprintall, Lijing Cheng, Mauro Cirano, Samantha Cruz, Marlos Goes, Shoichi Kizu, Franco Reseghetti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 50%
Student > Master 2 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 67%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2022.
All research outputs
#15,403,045
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#5,682
of 9,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,436
of 422,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#320
of 788 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 788 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.