↓ Skip to main content

Flexible and open-source programs for quantitative image analysis in microbial ecology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flexible and open-source programs for quantitative image analysis in microbial ecology
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, January 2023
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2023.1052119
Authors

Alexis L. Pasulka, Jonathan F. Hood, Dana E. Michels, Mason D. Wright

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,559,265
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#3,932
of 8,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,492
of 369,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#138
of 712 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 712 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.