↓ Skip to main content

Vertical heterogeneity of hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria in a core sediment sample from the Central Indian Ridge

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vertical heterogeneity of hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria in a core sediment sample from the Central Indian Ridge
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, April 2023
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2023.1170238
Authors

Tong Hao, Zhisong Cui, Xiao Luan, Guangzhu Zhou, Yingchao Li, Jinyan Liu, Junhui Chen, Zongling Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2023.
All research outputs
#15,211,576
of 24,150,351 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#5,516
of 9,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,336
of 389,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#211
of 593 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,150,351 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 593 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.