↓ Skip to main content

In situ carbon uptake of marine macrophytes is highly variable among species, taxa, and morphology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In situ carbon uptake of marine macrophytes is highly variable among species, taxa, and morphology
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, November 2023
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2023.1290054
Authors

Julian M. Jacobs, Lucian Himes, Florybeth F. La Valle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#16,907,808
of 24,862,965 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#7,041
of 10,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,182
of 166,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#164
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,862,965 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.