↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of annual variability in the population status and reproductive cycle of purple sea urchins (Heliocidaris crassispina, Agassiz, 1864) in Daya Bay, China

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of annual variability in the population status and reproductive cycle of purple sea urchins (Heliocidaris crassispina, Agassiz, 1864) in Daya Bay, China
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2023.1337159
Authors

Xinye Zhao, Xiaohui Mu, Yu Guo, Jiayang Li, Zhenhua Ma, Gang Yu, Chuanxin Qin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,424,061
of 25,101,232 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#8,376
of 10,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,302
of 162,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#147
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,101,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.