↓ Skip to main content

Southward key pathways of radioactive materials from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Southward key pathways of radioactive materials from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2024.1368674
Authors

Yihang Liu, Muping Zhou, Feng Zhou, Qicheng Meng, Xiao Ma, Qianjiang Zhang, Ruijie Ye

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,447,567
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#3,425
of 10,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,937
of 245,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#37
of 356 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 356 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.