↓ Skip to main content

FCFormer: fish density estimation and counting in recirculating aquaculture system

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
FCFormer: fish density estimation and counting in recirculating aquaculture system
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2024.1370786
Authors

Kaijie Zhu, Xinting Yang, Caiwei Yang, Tingting Fu, Pingchuan Ma, Weichen Hu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#17,406,668
of 25,539,438 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#7,484
of 10,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,466
of 157,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#142
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,539,438 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.