You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hindcasting estuary ecological states using sediment cores, modelled historic nutrient loads, and a Bayesian network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2024.1374869 |
| Authors |
Rachel Hale, John Zeldis, Bruce D. Dudley, Arman Haddadchi, David Plew, Ude Shankar, Andrew Swales, Keryn Roberts, Sorrel O’Connell-Milne, Piet Verburg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#17,413,658
of 25,547,904 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#7,488
of 10,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,838
of 163,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#147
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,547,904 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.