↓ Skip to main content

Emergent Models for Artificial Light-Harvesting

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Materials, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emergent Models for Artificial Light-Harvesting
Published in
Frontiers in Materials, February 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmats.2015.00006
Authors

Celestino Creatore, Alex W. Chin, Michael A. Parker, Stephen Emmott

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 29%
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 9 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Chemistry 2 8%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,800,681
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#290
of 2,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,814
of 357,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,444 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.