↓ Skip to main content

Improving the Direct Electron Transfer in Monolithic Bioelectrodes Prepared by Immobilization of FDH Enzyme on Carbon-Coated Anodic Aluminum Oxide Films

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Materials, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving the Direct Electron Transfer in Monolithic Bioelectrodes Prepared by Immobilization of FDH Enzyme on Carbon-Coated Anodic Aluminum Oxide Films
Published in
Frontiers in Materials, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmats.2016.00007
Authors

Alberto Castro-Muñiz, Yasuto Hoshikawa, Hiroshi Komiyama, Wataru Nakayama, Tetsuji Itoh, Takashi Kyotani

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 50%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Materials Science 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2016.
All research outputs
#18,438,457
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#602
of 2,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,267
of 400,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,461 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.