You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nano-Engineered Biomaterials for Tissue Regeneration: What Has Been Achieved So Far?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Materials, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmats.2016.00027 |
| Authors |
Sarah Mclaughlin, James Podrebarac, Marc Ruel, Erik J. Suuronen, Brian McNeill, Emilio I. Alarcon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 22% |
| Mexico | 2 | 22% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 18 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 9 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,459,747
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#89
of 2,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,074
of 358,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,776 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.