You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dome-Shape Auxetic Cellular Metamaterials: Manufacturing, Modeling, and Testing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Materials, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmats.2019.00086 |
| Authors |
Nathanael Easey, Dmytro Chuprynyuk, W. M. Syazwan Wan Musa, Angus Bangs, Yousef Dobah, Anton Shterenlikht, Fabrizio Scarpa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 55% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 29 | 38% |
| Materials Science | 7 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Design | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,490,986
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#67
of 2,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,564
of 350,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#6
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,539 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.