↓ Skip to main content

Characterizing the interfacial zones of fly ash based alkali activated adhesives to various substrates

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Materials, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterizing the interfacial zones of fly ash based alkali activated adhesives to various substrates
Published in
Frontiers in Materials, December 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmats.2022.1049383
Authors

Wolfgang Wisniewski, Vilma Ducman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 67%
Unspecified 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2022.
All research outputs
#20,595,145
of 25,305,422 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#758
of 3,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#357,288
of 486,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#64
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,305,422 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,028 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 486,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.