↓ Skip to main content

A review on tool wear issues in drilling CFRP laminates

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Materials, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review on tool wear issues in drilling CFRP laminates
Published in
Frontiers in Materials, September 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmats.2022.990773
Authors

Jinyang Xu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 8 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 8 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2022.
All research outputs
#19,837,169
of 24,378,020 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#662
of 2,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,913
of 419,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#27
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,378,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,835 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.