↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: MILD Combustion: Modelling Challenges, Experimental Configurations, and Diagnostic Tools

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: MILD Combustion: Modelling Challenges, Experimental Configurations, and Diagnostic Tools
Published in
Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, October 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmech.2021.726633
Authors

Alessandro Parente, Mara de Joannon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 35%
Computer Science 1 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Energy 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2021.
All research outputs
#18,809,260
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering
#255
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,374
of 433,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.