↓ Skip to main content

The Importance of Evaluating Primary Midwifery Care for Improving the Health of Women and Infants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Importance of Evaluating Primary Midwifery Care for Improving the Health of Women and Infants
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2015.00017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ank de Jonge, Raymond de Vries, Antoine L. M. Lagro-Janssen, Address Malata, Eugene Declercq, Soo Downe, Eileen K. Hutton

Abstract

In most countries, maternal and newborn care is fragmented and focused on identification and treatment of pathology that affects only the minority of women and babies. Recently, a framework for quality maternal and newborn care was developed, which encourages a system-level shift to provide skilled care for all. This care includes preventive and supportive care that works to strengthen women's capabilities and focuses on promotion of normal reproductive processes while ensuring access to emergency treatment when needed. Midwifery care is pivotal in this framework, which contains several elements that resonate with the main dimensions of primary care. Primary health care is the first level of contact with the health system where most of the population's curative and preventive health needs can be fulfilled as close as possible to where people live and work. In this paper, we argue that midwifery as described in the framework requires the application of a primary care philosophy for all childbearing women and infants. Evaluation of the implementation of the framework should therefore include tools to monitor the performance of primary midwifery care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Student > Master 14 14%
Other 9 9%
Researcher 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 34 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 20%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 30 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2015.
All research outputs
#2,433,293
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#569
of 5,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,473
of 263,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.