↓ Skip to main content

The Extracellular Matrix in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: Target and Source

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Extracellular Matrix in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: Target and Source
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, December 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2015.00091
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivana Mižíková, Rory E. Morty

Abstract

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a common complication of preterm birth that contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in neonatal intensive care units. BPD results from life-saving interventions, such as mechanical ventilation and oxygen supplementation used to manage preterm infants with acute respiratory failure, which may be complicated by pulmonary infection. The pathogenic pathways driving BPD are not well-delineated but include disturbances to the coordinated action of gene expression, cell-cell communication, physical forces, and cell interactions with the extracellular matrix (ECM), which together guide normal lung development. Efforts to further delineate these pathways have been assisted by the use of animal models of BPD, which rely on infection, injurious mechanical ventilation, or oxygen supplementation, where histopathological features of BPD can be mimicked. Notable among these are perturbations to ECM structures, namely, the organization of the elastin and collagen networks in the developing lung. Dysregulated collagen deposition and disturbed elastin fiber organization are pathological hallmarks of clinical and experimental BPD. Strides have been made in understanding the disturbances to ECM production in the developing lung, but much still remains to be discovered about how ECM maturation and turnover are dysregulated in aberrantly developing lungs. This review aims to inform the reader about the state-of-the-art concerning the ECM in BPD, to highlight the gaps in our knowledge and current controversies, and to suggest directions for future work in this exciting and complex area of lung development (patho)biology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Master 9 13%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2017.
All research outputs
#18,836,571
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#4,172
of 5,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,753
of 393,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.