You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Liquid Biopsy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2016.00069 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miguel A. Molina-Vila, Clara Mayo-de-las-Casas, Ana Giménez-Capitán, Núria Jordana-Ariza, Mónica Garzón, Ariadna Balada, Sergi Villatoro, Cristina Teixidó, Beatriz García-Peláez, Cristina Aguado, María José Catalán, Raquel Campos, Ana Pérez-Rosado, Jordi Bertran-Alamillo, Alejandro Martínez-Bueno, María-de-los-Llanos Gil, María González-Cao, Xavier González, Daniela Morales-Espinosa, Santiago Viteri, Niki Karachaliou, Rafael Rosell |
| Abstract |
Liquid biopsy analyses are already incorporated in the routine clinical practice in many hospitals and oncology departments worldwide, improving the selection of treatments and monitoring of lung cancer patients. Although they have not yet reached its full potential, liquid biopsy-based tests will soon be as widespread as "standard" biopsies and imaging techniques, offering invaluable diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive information. This review summarizes the techniques available for the isolation and analysis of circulating free DNA and RNA, exosomes, tumor-educated platelets, and circulating tumor cells from the blood of cancer patients, presents the methodological challenges associated with each of these materials, and discusses the clinical applications of liquid biopsy testing in lung cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 117 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 24 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2017.
All research outputs
#3,756,356
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#894
of 5,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,699
of 420,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.