↓ Skip to main content

Atopic Dermatitis Studies through In Vitro Models

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Atopic Dermatitis Studies through In Vitro Models
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, July 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2017.00119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evelyne De Vuyst, Michel Salmon, Céline Evrard, Catherine Lambert de Rouvroit, Yves Poumay

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a complex inflammatory skin condition that is not fully understood. Epidermal barrier defects and Th2 immune response dysregulations are thought to play crucial roles in the pathogenesis of the disease. A vicious circle takes place between these alterations, and it can further be complicated by additional genetic and environmental factors. Studies investigating in more depth the etiology of the disease are thus needed in order to develop functional treatments. In recent years, there have been significant advances regarding in vitro models reproducing important features of AD. However, since a lot of models have been developed, finding the appropriate experimental setting can be difficult. Therefore, herein, we review the different types of in vitro models mimicking features of AD. The simplest models are two-dimensional culture systems composed of immune cells or keratinocytes, whereas three-dimensional skin or epidermal equivalents reconstitute more complex stratified tissues exhibiting barrier properties. In those models, hallmarks of AD are obtained, either by challenging tissues with interleukin cocktails overexpressed in AD epidermis or by silencing expression of pivotal genes encoding epidermal barrier proteins. Tissue equivalents cocultured with lymphocytes or containing AD patient cells are also described. Furthermore, each model is placed in its study context with a brief summary of the main results obtained. In conclusion, the described in vitro models are useful tools to better understand AD pathogenesis, but also to screen new compounds in the field of AD, which probably will open the way to new preventive or therapeutic strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 223 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 14%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Unspecified 12 5%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 71 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 6%
Other 48 22%
Unknown 76 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2017.
All research outputs
#19,386,653
of 24,690,130 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#4,419
of 6,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,957
of 320,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#54
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,690,130 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.