You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome: Predictor of Dementia and Age-Related Negative Outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2017.00166 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jagadish K. Chhetri, Piu Chan, Bruno Vellas, Matteo Cesari |
| Abstract |
Cognitive disorders represent a leading cause of disability in the aging population, of which dementia has the highest global burden. Early signs of dementia such as slow gait and memory complaints are known to present well before the overt manifestation of the disease. Motoric cognitive risk (MCR) syndrome characterized by the simultaneous presence of gait disturbances and memory complaints in older subjects has been proposed to study the close interactions between the physical and cognitive domains as well as a possible approach to identify individuals at increased risk of dementia. In addition, studies have shown MCR as a predictor of other negative outcomes in older adults, including disability, falls and death. However, the concept of MCR is still in its early stage and approach to the syndrome is still not well established. This review aims to put together the various aspects of MCR syndrome including its pathophysiology, diagnosis, epidemiology, and relationship with other geriatric conditions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 18% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 47% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 9% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 37 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,928,827
of 25,931,626 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#559
of 7,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,152
of 341,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#7
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,931,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.