↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Imaging in Diagnosing Axial Spondyloarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of Imaging in Diagnosing Axial Spondyloarthritis
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, April 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2018.00106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikita Khmelinskii, Andrea Regel, Xenofon Baraliakos

Abstract

Imaging has a central role in the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). For the early diagnosis of axSpA, magnetic resonance imaging is of utmost relevance. While no novel imaging techniques were developed during the past decade, improvements to the existing modalities have been introduced. This report provides an overview of the applications and limitations of the existing imaging modalities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Other 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 30 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 32 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2020.
All research outputs
#14,388,641
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,486
of 5,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,826
of 327,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#68
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.