↓ Skip to main content

Strain-Specificity and Disease-Specificity of Probiotic Efficacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
43 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
312 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
382 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strain-Specificity and Disease-Specificity of Probiotic Efficacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2018.00124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynne V. McFarland, Charlesnika T. Evans, Ellie J. C. Goldstein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 382 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 382 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 13%
Student > Master 38 10%
Student > Bachelor 38 10%
Other 23 6%
Other 56 15%
Unknown 129 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 27 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 5%
Other 43 11%
Unknown 145 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#651,284
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#190
of 7,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,340
of 345,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#3
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.