You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Scoping Review of Neuroimaging Studies Investigating Frailty and Frailty Components
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2018.00284 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David López-Sanz, Isabel Suárez-Méndez, Raquel Bernabé, Natalia Pasquín, Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas, Fernando Maestú, Stefan Walter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 12% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 8 | 19% |
| Psychology | 4 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2018.
All research outputs
#14,405,644
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,414
of 7,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,115
of 357,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#38
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.