↓ Skip to main content

Patient Involvement in the Lifecycle of Medicines According to Belgian Stakeholders: The Gap Between Theory and Practice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient Involvement in the Lifecycle of Medicines According to Belgian Stakeholders: The Gap Between Theory and Practice
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, October 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2018.00285
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosanne Janssens, Eline van Overbeeke, Lotte Verswijvel, Lissa Meeusen, Carolien Coenegrachts, Kim Pauwels, Marc Dooms, Hilde Stevens, Steven Simoens, Isabelle Huys

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 19%
Researcher 10 15%
Other 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 18 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 22 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2021.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,224
of 7,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,599
of 360,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#45
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.