You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Patient Involvement in the Lifecycle of Medicines According to Belgian Stakeholders: The Gap Between Theory and Practice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2018.00285 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rosanne Janssens, Eline van Overbeeke, Lotte Verswijvel, Lissa Meeusen, Carolien Coenegrachts, Kim Pauwels, Marc Dooms, Hilde Stevens, Steven Simoens, Isabelle Huys |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Canada | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 19% |
Researcher | 10 | 15% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 18 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 22 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2021.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,224
of 7,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,599
of 360,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#45
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.