You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative Analysis of Podocyte Foot Process Morphology in Three Species by 3D Super-Resolution Microscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2018.00292 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadine Artelt, Florian Siegerist, Alina M. Ritter, Olaf Grisk, Rabea Schlüter, Karlhans Endlich, Nicole Endlich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 18% |
| Spain | 2 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Germany | 2 | 9% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 82% |
| Scientists | 4 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 17% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,463,124
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#615
of 6,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,567
of 352,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#18
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.