You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Women in Translational Medicine: Tools to Break the Glass Ceiling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2018.00330 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophie H. Bots, Mira G. P. Zuidgeest, Aisha Gohar, Anouk L. M. Eikendal, Alessandra Petrelli, Harmieke van Os-Medendorp, Marieke F. van der Schaaf, Nina M. van Sorge, Myriam van Wijk, Sabine Middendorp, Caroline M. Speksnijder, Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch, Vicky Seyfert-Margolis, Esther Mollema, Femke van Wijk, Hester M. den Ruijter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 22% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,652,269
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,713
of 7,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,740
of 447,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#17
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.