You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Best Practices of Blood Cultures in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2019.00131 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sien Ombelet, Barbara Barbé, Dissou Affolabi, Jean-Baptiste Ronat, Palpouguini Lompo, Octavie Lunguya, Jan Jacobs, Liselotte Hardy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Mexico | 1 | 11% |
| Argentina | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 306 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 11% |
| Researcher | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 16% |
| Unknown | 119 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 19% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 31 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 13% |
| Unknown | 129 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,792,785
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,334
of 7,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,399
of 369,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#17
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.