↓ Skip to main content

The Biological Foundations of Sarcopenia: Established and Promising Markers

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Biological Foundations of Sarcopenia: Established and Promising Markers
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, August 2019
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2019.00184
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martina Casati, Andrea Saul Costa, Daniele Capitanio, Luisa Ponzoni, Evelyn Ferri, Simone Agostini, Elisa Lori

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 38 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 49 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,729,855
of 24,717,692 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,656
of 6,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,323
of 347,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#22
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,692 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.