You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Danger of Herbal Tea: A Case of Acute Cholestatic Hepatitis Due to Artemisia annua Tea
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2019.00221 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Francisco Javier Ruperti-Repilado, Simon Haefliger, Sophia Rehm, Markus Zweier, Katharina M. Rentsch, Johannes Blum, Alexander Jetter, Markus Heim, Anne Leuppi-Taegtmeyer, Luigi Terracciano, Christine Bernsmeier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 2 | 17% |
France | 1 | 8% |
Belgium | 1 | 8% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Finland | 1 | 8% |
Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 23% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 16 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Philosophy | 2 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 17 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,748,174
of 23,414,653 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#932
of 6,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,483
of 354,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#22
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,414,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.