↓ Skip to main content

Impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Staging Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Staging Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, January 2020
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2019.00336
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Martucci, Mariarosa Pascale, Maria Carla Valli, Gianfranco A. Pesce, Patrizia Froesch, Luca Giovanella, Antonella Richetti, Giorgio Treglia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 16 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,093,049
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,658
of 5,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,930
of 451,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#29
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.