↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Early vs. Delayed Anakinra Treatment in Patients With Adult Onset Still's Disease and Effect on Clinical and Laboratory Outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Early vs. Delayed Anakinra Treatment in Patients With Adult Onset Still's Disease and Effect on Clinical and Laboratory Outcomes
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, February 2020
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2020.00042
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Vitale, Giulio Cavalli, Piero Ruscitti, Jurgen Sota, Serena Colafrancesco, Roberta Priori, Guido Valesini, Lorenza Maria Argolini, Elena Baldissera, Elena Bartoloni, Daniele Cammelli, Giovanni Canestrari, Elena Cavallaro, Maria Grazia Massaro, Paola Cipriani, Ginevra De Marchi, Salvatore De Vita, Giacomo Emmi, Micol Frassi, Roberto Gerli, Elisa Gremese, Florenzo Iannone, Marco Fornaro, Anna Paladini, Giuseppe Lopalco, Raffaele Manna, Alessandro Mathieu, Carlomaurizio Montecucco, Marta Mosca, Ilaria Piazza, Matteo Piga, Irene Pontikaki, Micol Romano, Silvia Rossi, Maurizio Rossini, Elena Silvestri, Chiara Stagnaro, Rosaria Talarico, Bruno Frediani, Angela Tincani, Ombretta Viapiana, Gianfranco Vitiello, Paola Galozzi, Paolo Sfriso, Carla Gaggiano, Salvatore Grosso, Donato Rigante, Lorenzo Dagna, Roberto Giacomelli, Luca Cantarini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 9 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 33%
Unspecified 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,092,336
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,658
of 5,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,912
of 361,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#35
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.