You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Diagnostic Value of Serum Biomarkers for Differentiating Central and Peripheral Causes of Acute Vertigo
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, March 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.00084 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jong-Hee Sohn, Chul-Ho Kim, Sang-Hwa Lee, Jong Ho Kim, Jae Jun Lee |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 17% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Professor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 29% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,033,706
of 23,281,392 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,366
of 5,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,131
of 368,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#31
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,281,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.