| Title |
Development and Potential Usefulness of the COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip Diagnostic Assay in a Pandemic Context
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.00225 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pascal Mertens, Nathalie De Vos, Delphine Martiny, Christian Jassoy, Ali Mirazimi, Lize Cuypers, Sigi Van den Wijngaert, Vanessa Monteil, Pierrette Melin, Karolien Stoffels, Nicolas Yin, Davide Mileto, Sabrina Delaunoy, Henri Magein, Katrien Lagrou, Justine Bouzet, Gabriela Serrano, Magali Wautier, Thierry Leclipteux, Marc Van Ranst, Olivier Vandenberg, LHUB-ULB SARS-CoV-2 Working Diagnostic Group, Béatrice Gulbis, Françoise Brancart, François Bry, Brigitte Cantinieaux, Francis Corazza, Fréderic Cotton, Maud Dresselhuis, Bhavna Mahadeb, Olivier Roels, Jacques Vanderlinden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 6 | 7% |
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 3 | 4% |
| Uruguay | 2 | 2% |
| Peru | 2 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 21% |
| Unknown | 40 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 72 | 89% |
| Scientists | 6 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 365 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 365 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 53 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 79 | 22% |
| Unknown | 103 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 10% |
| Engineering | 18 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 90 | 25% |
| Unknown | 122 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2022.
All research outputs
#258,419
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#104
of 7,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,681
of 416,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#4
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.